The well-known British physician and scientist Robert Winston once expressed his opinions about Richard Dawkins' contentious book "The God Delusion". Winston was worried about the ramifications of such a title, even though he had significant respect for Dawkins's intelligence and scientific contributions. Winston claims that calling religious skepticism "delusion" can be interpreted as an insult rather than a helpful counterargument. He thinks that people with opposing opinions are unlikely to be convinced by this strategy.

Consider a conversation between two neighbors about their gardens. Mr. Dawkins, a neighbor, incorporates scientific theories and facts about the world into his garden. Mr. Winston, the other neighbor, appreciates knowledge as well, but he also thinks it's important to plant religious flowers alongside scientific ones. Mr. Dawkins' choice to erect a sign that reads, "The Garden of False Beliefs," may offend some guests who derive solace and significance from their own beliefs. According to Mr. Winston, such a strategy might backfire since it might alienate prospective conversation rather than fostering fruitful dialogue.

Winston's viewpoint emphasizes how crucial polite conversation is when talking about extremely private subjects like faith and religion. He contends that the use of words like "delusion" can actually work against people of different beliefs rather than to bring them together. Rather, he supports a more nuanced strategy that critically challenges concepts while honoring differing points of view.