During his time as a congressman, Ron Dellums, an American politician renowned for his activism and support of justice and peace, said this. He was talking about how some of the values he held were frequently referred to as "radical," but in his opinion, these concepts weren't radical at all; rather, they were just what he believed to be morally correct.

Dellums had strong opinions on matters that were important at the time, such as ending the Vietnam War and cutting military spending. He argued that there were urgent social needs that also needed funding and attention, and that a significant amount of federal funds shouldn't be used for destructive purposes. He frequently disagreed with more conservative politicians who valued defense spending over social programs because of his position on these issues.

To put it metaphorically, picture yourself building a house with military spending for the walls and community welfare for the roof. For the structure to be stable and long-lasting, Dellums thought it was essential to make sure both components were well-built and sufficiently funded. He believed that the very people the government was meant to protect were undermined when excessive funds were allocated to defense at the expense of social needs.

Dellums' goal in politics was to emphasize the significance of values like justice and peace in forming public policy, not to be confrontational or rebellious for the sake of being so. He was a significant figure in American politics because of his readiness to stand up for these causes, even when his opponents branded them as radical.

By standing up for what he thought was right, Dellums encouraged others to consider the values that ought to govern our society and the priorities of government spending.