In reference to his early skepticism regarding global warming, American politician and former U.S. Representative for New York's 13th congressional district Michael Grimm made this statement. Grimm frequently voiced caution about climate change issues during his political career, emphasizing the intricacy of scientific data and contradictory reports from around the globe.

Because environmental science is complex and researchers occasionally present differing opinions based on their research and interpretations, Grimm's skepticism is understandable. When non-specialists try to put together a large puzzle, it can be challenging to see the whole picture because some of the pieces have different colors or shapes than others.

Grimm is considering his role as someone who first questioned the scientific consensus regarding climate change in this quote. He stresses the need for more research and more definite scientific consensus before making firm conclusions, though, acknowledging that the evidence is not yet conclusive.

By stating that "the jury is obviously still out," Grimm implies that there isn't a definitive decision about the causes and effects of global warming. He also acknowledges his ignorance of climate science, which emphasizes how crucial it is to consult professionals in order to comprehend complicated topics like environmental change.

All things considered, Michael Grimm's statement emphasizes how difficult it can be to form opinions about scientific subjects when the data can be contradictory and requires specific knowledge to interpret correctly.