Former Estonian President Kersti Kaljulaid frequently discusses issues of international relations and governance. One of her well-known remarks expresses her displeasure with politicians who assert that their nations are profiting financially while simultaneously disparaging the organizations or unions that are in charge of these benefits.

In conversations concerning the European Union, Kaljulaid's observation is especially pertinent. She finds it concerning when leaders openly attack the EU in spite of data demonstrating the obvious economic benefits of membership for their countries. Rhetoric like this has the potential to mislead the public and erode confidence in both national governments and global institutions like the EU.

Consider a farmer who sells his produce to a cooperative, which gives him access to markets and better prices than he could get on his own. Even though he still makes money from these cooperatives, the same farmer begins to tell others that joining them is not advantageous. This discrepancy has the potential to undermine community trust and make other farmers reconsider joining or renewing their membership.

The idea that political messaging needs to be clear and consistent in order to effectively influence public opinion is the source of Kaljulaid's concern. Leaders run the risk of losing credibility with both domestic and foreign partners when their statements are inconsistent with verifiable facts. Her remarks emphasize the value of openness and truthfulness in leadership, stressing that the advantages of organizations like the EU shouldn't be diminished by erratic or deceptive rhetoric or inconsistent messaging.

Kaljulaid's viewpoint emphasizes the necessity for public leaders to speak candidly about the benefits and difficulties of their nation's participation in global economic systems. This clarity promotes informed decision-making processes both domestically and abroad and helps to preserve public trust.