A significant player in American politics in the middle of the 20th century, George Wallace frequently voiced his disapproval of what he saw as inequities in the political and legal systems. Wallace expressed in one of his speeches how a lack of responsible journalism can occasionally allow legislation to pass without much public scrutiny.

Wallace was talking about a particular federal law that he thought was passed under underwhelming circumstances. He asserts that this law might not have been passed in the first place if there had been more reporters prepared to delve deeper and reveal its actual nature. He maintained that in order for the public to make educated decisions, the press has an obligation to educate them about complicated legal issues.

Wallace also emphasized how the Supreme Court facilitates this kind of legislation. He said that some contentious bills might never pass because of legal challenges and public outcry if they don't have the backing of powerful judicial bodies like the Supreme Court.

Consider a river passing through a city as an analogy. Pollutants can easily enter the water system undetected if there are no guards at strategic locations along the river to ensure it follows its intended course (representing the press). Similar to this, problematic elements may enter our legal system unopposed if the Supreme Court serves as gatekeepers but does not thoroughly examine what makes it through.

This Wallace quotation demonstrates his conviction that upholding moral principles in the political and legislative processes requires a watchful press and strong judicial oversight.