Former West Virginia congressman Richard Ojeda has been outspoken about his disapproval of pharmaceutical companies and their business practices. He specifically criticizes what he perceives to be detrimental actions by these corporations using strong language.

Consider pharmaceutical behemoths to be formidable warlords in a bygone era. Similar to how warlords use iron fists to rule over areas, big pharmaceutical companies have a big say in healthcare regulations and drug availability. Major drug manufacturers are compared to extremist organizations in Ojeda's statement because of their alleged aggressive strategies and disdain for the general welfare. He implies that they exercise power in a manner that puts financial gain ahead of the needs of people's health.

This comparison raises questions about how these companies might carry out actions that appear harmful to the public at large, like charging exorbitant costs for necessary prescription drugs or restricting access based more on profit than on altruism. By calling for more open and moral business practices in the pharmaceutical sector, his metaphor seeks to highlight the apparent misalignment between corporate interests and public health priorities.

By presenting his criticism in this manner, Ojeda hopes to sway public opinion and possibly persuade authorities to examine these powerful corporations' business practices more closely.