During a period of severe conflict in Syria, Adam Curtis, a well-known British documentary filmmaker renowned for his perceptive investigations of history, politics, and society, made this observation. He was thinking about the Battle of Kobane, a pivotal conflict between Islamic State (IS) militants and Kurdish defenders that occurred close to the Turkish-Syrian border.

Curtis saw a strange pattern in the way people talked about the battle: a lot of focus was placed on the ideology and motivations of the enemy, but not much on the reasons why the Kurdish fighters were prepared to risk their lives. His remark serves as a reminder that while the more subdued, principled resistance may be disregarded or misinterpreted, it is frequently simpler to comprehend and sympathize with an aggressor because they are active, visible forces.

Using a metaphor, picture a storm at sea where everyone's attention is focused on the raging winds and tall waves. Since they take center stage, it's simple to concentrate on these dramatic components. What is frequently overlooked, though, is the strong anchor that keeps a small boat afloat in the face of chaos. Despite overwhelming odds, the Kurds fighting in Kobane remained resolute in their defense of their homeland, serving as that anchor.

By bringing this to our attention, Curtis challenges us to see past superficial stories and try to comprehend the reasons behind people who struggle for justice, freedom, or even just survival during difficult times. His remarks urge society and the media to treat both sides of a conflict equally, not only to report on dangers but also to emphasize bravery and resiliency.